Cloze Tests: Use Grammar and Context Together

A cloze test asks you to rebuild the meaning and grammar of a passage. A word that sounds natural beside one blank can still fail elsewhere in the sentence or contradict the surrounding story. Read beyond the gap before deciding.

These original cloze test questions and answers show how to use word class, sentence structure and passage-wide meaning together. Each blank takes one word. The explanations identify several acceptable alternatives where the wording allows them. Other proposals still need a grammatical, coherent reading of the whole passage. This is learning guidance, not an official marking scheme.

Use three levels of evidence

Start with the whole passage: who is involved, what happens and when? Next examine the complete sentence, including its punctuation. Finally inspect the words immediately before and after the gap. Moving between these levels prevents a familiar phrase from pulling you towards an answer that does not fit the situation.

  • Meaning: does the sentence need a cause, a contrast, a sequence or a description?
  • Structure: does the gap require a pronoun, verb, preposition, conjunction or another form?
  • Form: does the proposed word agree with its subject and fit the tense or construction?

Do not assume that a particular nearby word always demands the same answer. “To” can introduce an infinitive, as in “to repair”, but it can also be a preposition, as in “look forward to repairing”. The construction and meaning decide the form.

Practice 1: follow the grammar through a narrative

Original passage: Before the demonstration

By the time the visitors arrived yesterday, the alarm had (1) ___ tested twice. Each of the labels (2) ___ neatly printed, and the team checked that neither loose wires (3) ___ spare tools remained on the table. A visitor interested (4) ___ the design asked to meet the learner (5) ___ sketch had inspired it. (6) ___ the first demonstration failed, the team did not give up. After tightening a connection, they tried again.

Your task: fill all six gaps before consulting the answers. For each choice, identify at least one grammatical clue and check whether the completed passage makes sense.

Answers with reasoning

  1. been: “Had been tested” is a past perfect passive construction. The testing was completed before the visitors arrived, and the alarm received the action. “Being” does not fit after “had” in this construction.
  2. was: the subject is “Each”, not the plural noun inside “of the labels”. The passage describes yesterday’s preparation, so “was neatly printed” fits. “Were” would incorrectly agree with “labels” rather than “Each”. “Got” also permits a less formal passive reading: each label got printed.
  3. nor: “Neither … nor” links the two unwanted things. Both loose wires and spare tools are excluded. “Or” does not complete the standard paired construction used here.
  4. in: someone is “interested in” a subject or design. The preposition connects the adjective to what attracts the visitor’s attention.
  5. whose: the sketch belongs to the learner. “Whose” expresses that relationship before the noun “sketch”. “Who’s” means “who is” or “who has” and would not work here.
  6. Although: failure might normally discourage the team, but they continue. “Though” also works. “While” is acceptable if read as concessive, meaning despite the failure; “although” makes that contrast especially clear. “When” and “After” are also coherent, but express timing rather than emphasising an unexpected response to failure.

Notice that several answers depend on more than one clue. The second requires subject identification and a suitable tense. The final answer requires the relationship between two clauses, not simply the word following the blank.

Practice 2: distinguish sequence from contrast

Original passage: The seed exchange

The gardening club planned a seed exchange. Members were asked to bring seeds only if they knew (1) ___ plants the seeds came from. Before any packet was accepted, its label (2) ___ checked by a volunteer. The club recorded the name of each person (3) ___ donated a packet. This made it possible to ask questions later.

Some packets contained more seeds (4) ___ others, so the volunteers divided the larger quantities. They did not promise that every seed would grow; (5) ___, they explained that storage and growing conditions could affect the result. Only after the labels had been checked (6) ___ the exchange begin.

Answers with reasoning

  1. which: this introduces an embedded question identifying the plants. “What” is also possible and gives a slightly more open question about their identity. Both work with the plural noun “plants”. “Whose” is also grammatical if the condition concerns ownership of the source plants; the original wording does not explicitly rule out that reading.
  2. was: the label is singular and receives the checking action. The surrounding past-tense account supports “was checked”. “Were” would not agree with “label”. “Got” is another possible passive choice, though less formal than “was”.
  3. who: this introduces a defining relative clause about the person. “That” is also grammatically acceptable in this defining clause. “Whose” would require a following noun showing possession.
  4. than: “More … than” makes the comparison between packet quantities. “Then” concerns time or consequence and does not perform this comparative function.
  5. instead: the explanation replaces a promise of guaranteed growth. “Rather” is also a reasonable corrective link here. The punctuation permits a linking adverb; “because” would not fit the supplied semicolon and comma in the same way.
  6. did: when a limiting expression such as “Only after …” begins this sentence, the main clause uses inversion: “did the exchange begin”. The base form “begin” follows “did”; “had” would require “begun”. “Could” also works, making the checking a condition for a possible or permitted start. “Would” can express the expected sequence from a past viewpoint. The original passage allows these readings; “did” specifically reports the event.

For the fifth gap, meaning matters more than choosing a word merely because it can follow a semicolon. “Consequently” would suggest a result relationship that does not describe the shift from an unsupported promise to an explanation as precisely.

For the sixth, the ordinary sequence would be “The exchange began only after the labels had been checked.” Comparing the two versions helps you see why the blank needs an auxiliary rather than another time word.

Practice 3: use the second sentence to test the first

Original passage: Correcting the route map

The walking club did not cancel its outing (1) ___ of the rain. It cancelled because the bridge on its route was closed. The notice asked members to wait (2) ___ a revised route had been approved. Anyone (3) ___ had already packed could leave their bag in the club room. The organisers promised to send an update as soon as they had (4) ___ confirmation.

Try these answers, then explain your choices

  1. because: “Because of” introduces a noun phrase, here “the rain”. The negative sentence rejects rain as the cause; the following sentence supplies the real cause. “Despite of” is not a standard construction.
  2. until: the approval marks the end of the waiting period. “Till” is also grammatically acceptable, though “until” is a neutral choice for this notice.
  3. who: the clause identifies the people who had already packed. “That” can also work in this defining construction, although “who” is the more natural choice for people here.
  4. received: “Had received” presents confirmation as completed before the promised update. “Obtained” or “secured” also works here, as does the less formal “got”. Each is a past participle with a meaning that fits getting confirmation. “Receive” would not fit after “had”.

Now read the passage without stopping at the blanks. It should give a consistent account: a closed bridge caused cancellation, approval was pending, packed bags could be stored, and confirmation would precede an update. This final reading catches errors that checking isolated answers misses.

A practical checking routine

During practice, record why an answer failed. Useful categories include wrong word class, incorrect agreement, unsuitable tense, a confused expression and a meaning mismatch. “I did not know the answer” is less useful than “I chose a plural verb because the nearest noun was plural”.

Return to difficult gaps after solving the clearer ones. Completed sentences may reveal a pattern or relationship you missed. If two answers still seem possible, read both versions aloud and explain what each means. An alternative should satisfy the grammar and the passage, not merely resemble the model answer.

For a refresher on identifying nouns, the site’s public English grammar notes include noun examples and exercises. Use that foundation to locate the actual subject before checking agreement.

Frequently asked questions

Should I fill the blanks on my first reading?

Read the whole passage first if possible. Establish its subject, sequence and viewpoint. You can then return to the gaps with more information than the neighbouring words provide.

Can more than one cloze answer be correct?

Sometimes. An open gap can admit alternatives that preserve grammar and meaning. The models above name several. A different answer still needs to fit the complete sentence and passage.

Does a blank always need one word?

Only when the instructions say so. These exercises require one word per gap. Read the directions for any other task rather than carrying that rule over automatically.

How do I choose between a preposition and a conjunction?

Inspect what follows. A preposition commonly introduces a noun phrase, while a conjunction can join clauses. Compare “because of the rain” with “because it rained”.

Should all verbs use the same tense?

No. Tenses should express the actual time relationships. A past narrative may use the past perfect for an earlier event. Consistency means a coherent timeline, not identical forms everywhere.

What if a familiar phrase seems to fit?

Treat it as a candidate, then check agreement, punctuation and wider meaning. Familiarity is useful evidence, but it cannot override a sentence that requires a different construction.

How can I improve without memorising answers?

Explain each answer, rewrite a sentence with a different subject or time reference, and observe what changes. Keep a record of recurring error types and revisit them in fresh passages.

Continue with English practice

The existing KCSE English topical resource page requires login to view its content. Check its available materials if you want further revision. The three original passages, all answers and the reasoning needed to practise this method are complete above.